Adler, Jane W., Deborah R. Hensler, and Charles E. Nelson. 1983. Simple Justice: How Litigants Fare in the Pittsburgh Court Arbitration Program. Santa Monica, CA: The Rand Institute for Civil Justice. http://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/reports/2007/R3071.pdf.
Asch, Solomon E. 1955. “Opinions and Social Pressure.” Scientific American 193（5）: 31–35.
Azzi, Assaad E. 1993. “Group Representation and Procedural Justice in MultiGroup Decision-Making Bodies.” Social Justice Research 6（2）: 195–218.
Baker, C. Edwin. 2003. “Michelman on Constitutional Democracy.” Tulsa Law Review 39: 511–46.
Berg, Sven. 1993. “Condorcet’s Jury Theorem Revisited.” European Journal of Political Economy 9（3）: 437–46.
Bohman, James. 1997. “Deliberative Democracy and Effective Social Freedom: Capabilities, Resources, and Opportunities.” In Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics, eds. James Bohman and William Rehg. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 321–48. http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/42328584.
———. 1998. “The Coming of Age of Deliberative Democracy.” Journal of Political Philosophy 6（4）: 400–425.
Brandom, Robert. 2000. “Facts, Norms, and Normative Facts: A Reply to Habermas.” European Journal of Philosophy 8（3）: 356–74.
Brown, Rebecca L. 1998. “Accountability, Liberty, and the Constitution.” Columbia Law Review 98（3）: 531–79.
Chevigny, Paul G. 1989. “Fairness and Participation: Review of The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice.” New York University Law Review 64: 1211–23.
Cohen, Joshua. 1997a. “Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy.” In Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics, eds. James Bohman and William Rehg. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 67–91. http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/42328584.
———. 1997b. “Procedure and Substance in Deliberative Democracy.” In Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics, eds. James Bohman and William Rehg. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 407–37. http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/42328584.
———. 2007. “Deliberative Democracy.” In Deliberation, Participation and Democracy: Can the People Govern?, ed. Shawn W. Rosenberg. Basingstoke, United Kingdom: Palgrave Macmillan, 219–36. http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/132581639.
Cronin, Ciaran. 2006. “On the Possibility of a Democratic Constitutional Founding: Habermas and Michelman in Dialogue.” Ratio Juris 19（3）: 343–69.
Delli Carpini, Michael X., Fay Lomax Cook, and Lawrence R. Jacobs. 2004. “Public Deliberation, Discursive Participation, and Citizen Engagement: A Review of the Empirical Literature.” Annual Review of Political Science 7（1）: 315–44.
Dryzek, John S. 2004. “Pragmatism and Democracy: In Search of Deliberative Publics.” The Journal of Speculative Philosophy 18（1）: 72–79.
Elster, Jon. 1997. “The Market and the Forum: Three Varieties of Political Theory.” In Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics, eds. James Bohman and William Rehg. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 3–33. http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/42328584.
Estlund, David. 1997. “Beyond Fairness and Deliberation.” In Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics, eds. James Bohman and William Rehg. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 173–204. http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/42328584.
Ferrara, Alessandro. 2001. “Of Boats and Principles: Reflections on Habermas’s ‘Constitutional Democracy.’” Political Theory 29（6）: 782–91.
Fishkin, James S. 2009. “Virtual Public Consultation: Prospects for Internet Deliberative Democracy.” In Online Deliberation: Design, Research, and Practice, eds. Todd Davies and Seeta Peña Gangadharan. Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information, 23–35. http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/434744176.
———. 2011a. “Deliberative Democracy and Constitutions.” Social Philosophy and Policy 28（1）: 242–60.
———. 2011b. “Why Deliberative Polling? Reply to Gleason.” Critical Review 23（3）: 393–403.
Flynn, Jeffrey. 2004. “Communicative Power in Habermas’s Theory of Democracy.” European Journal of Political Theory 3（4）: 433–54.
Gastil, John, Richards Robert, and Katie Katherine. 2014. “Vicarious Deliberation: How the Oregon Citizens’ Initiative Review Influenced Deliberation in Mass Elections.” International Journal of Communication 8: 62–89.
Gaus, Gerald F. 1997. “Looking for the Best and Finding None Better: The Epistemic Case for Democracy.” The Modern Schoolman 74（4）: 277–84.
Gregoratto, Federica. 2013. “Transnational Discourses Between Facts and Norms. Toward a Two-Track Model of the Public Sphere.” Nordicum-Mediterraneum: Icelandic E-Journal of Nordic and Mediterranean Studies 8（2）: 65–82.
Grönlund, Kimmo, Kaisa Herne, and Maija Setälä. 2015. “Does Enclave Deliberation Polarize Opinions?” Political Behavior: 1–26.
Gutmann, Amy, and Dennis F. Thompson. 2002. “Deliberative Democracy Beyond Process.” Journal of Political Philosophy 10（2）: 153–74.
———. 2004a. “Deliberative Democracy Beyond Process.” In Why Deliberative Democracy?, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 95–124. http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/54066447.
———. 2004b. “Just Deliberation about Health Care.” In Why Deliberative Democracy?, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 139–59. http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/54066447.
———. 2004c. “Moral Conflict and Political Consensus.” In Why Deliberative Democracy?, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 64–94. http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/54066447.
———. 2004d. “What Deliberative Democracy Means.” In Why Deliberative Democracy?, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1–63. http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/54066447.
———. 2004e. “Why Deliberative Democracy Is Different.” In Why Deliberative Democracy?, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 125–38. http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/54066447.
Habermas, Jürgen. 1975. Legitimation Crisis. Boston, MA: Beacon Press. http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/1129996.
———. 1984. The Theory of Communicative Action. Boston, MA: Beacon Press. http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/9732141.
———. 1994. “Struggles for Recognition in the Democratic Constitutional State.” In Multiculturalism: Examining the Politics of Recognition, eds. Charles Taylor, Amy Gutmann, and Charles Taylor. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 107–48. http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/30671104.
———. 1996. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
———. 1998. “A Genealogical Analysis of the Cognitive Content of Morality.” In The Inclusion of the Other: Studies in Political Theory, eds. Ciaran Cronin and Pablo De Greiff. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 3–46. http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/42328771.
———. 2001. “Constitutional Democracy: A Paradoxical Union of Contradictory Principles?” Political Theory 29（6）: 766–81.
———. 2003. “On Law and Disagreement: Some Comments on ‘Interpretative Pluralism.’” Ratio Juris 16（2）: 187–94.
———. 2006. “Political Communication in Media Society: Does Democracy Still Enjoy an Epistemic Dimension? The Impact of Normative Theory on Empirical Research.” Communication Theory 16（4）: 411–26.
Hardin, Russell. 2000. “Democratic Epistemology and Accountability.” Social Philosophy and Policy 17（1）: 110–26.
Hayward, Clarissa Rile. 2007. “Democracy’s Identity Problem: Is ‘Constitutional Patriotism’ the Answer?” Constellations 14（2）: 182–96.
Heller, Agnes. 1982. “Habermas and Marxism.” In Habermas: Critical Debates, eds. John B. Thompson and David Held. Cambridge, MA: Macmillan, 21–41. http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/8780096.
Hibbing, John R., and Elizabeth Theiss-Morse. 2002. Stealth Democracy: Americans’ Beliefs About How Government Should Work. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press. http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/52612618.
Hillier, Jean. 1998. “Beyond Confused Noise: Ideas Toward Communicative Procedural Justice.” Journal of Planning Education and Research 18（1）: 14–24.
Honig, Bonnie. 2001. “Dead Rights, Live Futures: A Reply to Habermas’s ‘Constitutional Democracy.’” Political Theory 29（6）: 792–805.
Ingham, Sean. 2013. “Disagreement and Epistemic Arguments for Democracy.” Politics, Philosophy and Economics 12（2）: 136–55.
Ingram, Attracta. 1996. “Constitutional Patriotism.” Philosophy and Social Criticism 22（6）: 1–18.
Johnson, James. 1998. “Arguing for Deliberation: Some Skeptical Considerations.” In Deliberative Democracy, ed. Jon Elster. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press, 161–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139175005.009.
Karjalainen, Maija, and Lauri Rapeli. 2014. “Who Will Not Deliberate? Attrition in a Multi-Stage Citizen Deliberation Experiment.” Quality and Quantity 49（1）: 407–22.
Knobloch, Katherine R., John Gastil, Justin Reedy, and Katherine Cramer Walsh. 2013. “Did They Deliberate? Applying an Evaluative Model of Democratic Deliberation to the Oregon Citizens’ Initiative Review.” Journal of Applied Communication Research 41（2）: 105–25.
Lafont, Cristina. 2003. “Procedural Justice? Implications of the Rawls-Habermas Debate for Discourse Ethics.” Philosophy & Social Criticism 29（2）: 163–81.
Lind, E. Allan, and Tom R. Tyler. 1988. The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice. New York, NY: Plenum Press. http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/17354210.
McCann, Michael. 2004. “Law and Social Movements.” In The Blackwell Companion to Law and Society, ed. Austin Sarat. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 502–22. http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/53097379.
McGann, Anthony J. 2006. “The Logical Bases of Deliberative Democracy: The Limits of Consensus.” In The Logic of Democracy: Reconciling Equality, Deliberation, and Minority Protection, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 153–74. http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/63178809.
Mercier, Hugo, and Helene E. Landemore. 2010. Reasoning Is for Arguing: Understanding the Successes and Failures of Deliberation. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. SSRN Scholarly Paper 1707029. http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=1707029.
Merkel, Wolfgang. 2013. “Is There a Crisis of Democracy? Can We Answer the Question?” Presented at the American Political Science Association Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL. http://www.democracybarometer.org/Papers/Merkel_2013_APSA.pdf.
Michelman, Frank I. 2001. “Morality, Identity and ‘Constitutional Patriotism.’” Ratio Juris 14（3）: 253–71.
Müller, Jan-Werner. 2008. “A General Theory of Constitutional Patriotism.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 6（1）: 72–95.
Mutz, Diana C. 2008. “Is Deliberative Democracy a Falsifiable Theory?” Annual Review of Political Science 11（1）: 521–38.
Olson, Kevin. 2006. “Paradoxes of Constitutional Democracy.” Unpublished Manuscript. http://web.law.columbia.edu/sites/default/files/microsites/law-culture/files/2006-files/Olson-Paper.doc.
———. 2007. “Paradoxes of Constitutional Democracy.” American Journal of Political Science 51（2）: 330–43.
Plot, Martin. 2009. “Communicative Action’s Democratic Deficit: A Critique of Habermas’s Contribution to Democratic Theory.” International Journal of Communication 3: 825–52.
Price, Vincent, and Joseph N. Cappella. 2002. “Online Deliberation and Its Influence: The Electronic Dialogue Project in Campaign 2000.” IT and Society 1（1）: 303–29.
Pronin, Emily, Carolyn Puccio, and Lee Ross. 2002. “Understanding Misunderstanding: Social Psychological Perspectives.” In Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment, eds. Thomas Gilovich, Dale W. Griffin, and Daniel Kahneman. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press, 636–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808098.038.
Rae, Douglas W. 1975. “The Limits of Consensual Decision.” The American Political Science Review 69（4）: 1270–94.
Rawls, John. 1995. “Political Liberalism: Reply to Habermas.” The Journal of Philosophy 92（3）: 132–80.
———. 1999. A Theory of Justice. Revised Ed. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/438072248.
Rienstra, Byron, and Derek Hook. 2006. “Weakening Habermas: The Undoing of Communicative Rationality.” Draft of Journal Article. http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/955.
Ron, Amit. 2010. “The ‘Public’ in ‘Public Peace Process’ and in ‘Mini-Publics’: A Dialogue Between Democratic Theory and Peace Studies.” Peace and Conflict Studies 17（2）: 347–77.
Scheingold, Stuart A. 2004. “‘The Dog That Didn’t Bark’: A Sociolegal Tale of Law, Democracy, and Elections.” In The Blackwell Companion to Law and Society, ed. Austin Sarat. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 523–41. http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/53097379.
Scruton, Roger. 1990. “In Defence of the Nation.” In Ideas and Politics in Modern Britain, ed. J. C. D Clark. London, United Kingdom: Palgrave Macmillan, 53–87.
Shotter, John. 1993. Cultural Politics of Everyday Life: Social Constructionism, Rhetoric and Knowing of the Third Kind. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press. http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/28019359.
Sunstein, Cass R. 1999. The Law of Group Polarization. Chicago, IL: Law School, University of Chicago. John M. Olin Law and Economics Working Paper 91. http://m.law.uchicago.edu/files/files/91.CRS_.Polarization.pdf.
———. 2000. “Deliberative Trouble? Why Groups Go to Extremes.” The Yale Law Journal 110（1）: 71–119.
———. 2002. “The Law of Group Polarization.” Journal of Political Philosophy 10（2）: 175–95.
———. 2007. “Ideological Amplification.” Constellations 14（2）: 273–79.
Thibaut, John, Laurens Walker, and Pauline Houlden. 1974. “Procedural Justice as Fairness.” Stanford Law Review 26（6）: 1271–89.
Thibaut, John W., and Laurens Walker. 1975. Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates. http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/1366292.
Vidmar, Neil. 1989. “The Origins and Consequences of Procedural Fairness: Review of The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice.” Law and Social Inquiry 15（1）: 877–92.
Waldschlagel, Matt. 2010. “Arrow’s Theorem and the Defense of Democracy.” Southwest Philosophy Review 26（2）: 109–18.
Walker, Laurens, Stephen Latour, E. Allan Lind, and John Thibaut. 1974. “Reactions of Participants and Observers to Modes of Adjudication.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology 4（4）: 295–310.
Wolkenstein, Fabio. 2015. “What Can We Hold Against Populism?” Philosophy and Social Criticism 41（2）: 111–29.
--------
【延伸閱讀】
0. 前言
1. 憲政愛國主義的使命：鞏固既有憲政正當性
2. 直接民主與盧梭式多數決的理論缺陷
3. 既反算計偏好、更反直接民主的慎思民主
4. 憲政愛國主義與慎思民主的理論缺陷
5. 慎思審議的社會心理學問題
6. 公民審議陪審團實驗
7. 早已和解的當代民主理論爭鋒
8. 太陽花錯在哪裡？
9. 結論：民主無法通過多重曲解與雜碎剪貼而得救
沒有留言:
張貼留言