參考書目
Bohman, James. 1998. “Survey Article: The Coming of Age of Deliberative Democracy.” Journal of political philosophy 6(4): 400–425.
Brownsey, P. F. 1978. “Hume and the Social Contract.” The Philosophical Quarterly: 132–48.
Chemerinsky, Erwin. 2001. “Getting Beyond Formalism in Constitutional Law: Constitutional Theory Matters.” Oklahoma Law Review 54: 1.
DiSalvo, Carl. 2010. “Design, Democracy and Agonistic Pluralism.” Presented at the Design Research Society Conference 2010, Montreal, Canada.
Dorussen, Han. 2006. “Heterogeneous Trade Interests and Conflict What You Trade Matters.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 50(1): 87–107.
Garcia-Montalvo, Jose G., and Marta Reynal-Querol. 2004. “Ethnic Polarization, Potential Conflict, and Civil Wars.”
Garcia-Montalvo, Jose G., and Marta Reynal-Querol. 2005. “Ethnic Diversity and Economic Development.” Journal of Development Economics 76(2): 293–323.
Kapoor, Ilan. 2002. “Deliberative Democracy or Agonistic Pluralism? The Relevance of the Habermas-Mouffe Debate for Third World Politics.” Alternatives: Global, Local, Political 27(4): 459–87.
Kennedy, Duncan. 2001. “Legal Formalism” eds. Neil J. Smelser and Paul B. Baltes. International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences 13.
Miller, David. 1992. “Deliberative Democracy and Social Choice.” Political studies 40(s1): 54–67.
Mouffe, Chantal. 1999. “Deliberative Democracy or Agonistic Pluralism?” Social research: 745–58.
Mouffe, Chantal. 2009. “The Limits of John Rawls’ Pluralism.” Theoria: A Journal of Social and Political Theory 56(118): 1–14.
Osborne, Evan. 2000. “Diversity, Multiculturalism, and Ethnic Conflict: A Rent-Seeking Perspective.” Kyklos 53(4): 509–26.
Parkinson, John. 2003. “Legitimacy Problems in Deliberative Democracy.” Political studies 51(1): 180–96.
Potter, Elizabeth. 2013. “Scientific Judgment and Agonistic Pluralism.” Philosophical Studies 163(1): 85–92.
Ryfe, David M. 2005. “Does Deliberative Democracy Work?” Annual Review of Political Science 8(1): 49–71.
Saward, Michael. 2000. “Direct and Deliberative Democracy.” Presented at the “Democracy from Below” Workshop, European Consortium for Political Research Joint Sessions, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Stearns, Maxwell L. 2011. “Direct (Anti-) Democracy.” George Washington Law Review 80: 311.
Sunstein, Cass R. 1999. “Must Formalism Be Defended Empirically?” The University of Chicago Law Review: 636–70.
Vanhanen, Tatu. 2012. “Ethnic Conflict and Violence in Heterogeneous Societies.” The Journal of Social, Political, and Economic Studies 37(1): 38-66.
Weinrib, Ernest J. 1988. “Legal Formalism: On the Immanent Rationality of Law.” Yale Law Journal: 949–1016.
Young, Iris Marion. 2001. “Activist Challenges to Deliberative Democracy.” Political Theory 29(5): 670–90.
----
延伸閱讀
前言
01解嚴後的臺灣從來不缺政治參與
02民調結果如流水，所以不足以為民主代表性
03以個人主觀好惡為正當性來源的最後手段論
04法定選舉是唯一判斷民主代表性的依據
05審議民主其實更反對違法違憲
06社會契約是不能隨意收回的
07望文生義的對法形式主義之批評
08審議民主其實仍很精英
09審議民主更倚賴程序正義
10多元異質與程序正義
11直接民權的反民主本質
12堅守程序正義才能保障人民基本權利
沒有留言:
張貼留言